\nFunctional Outcome Level Upon Admission: 5.5<\/strong>
\nFunctional Outcome Level Upon Discharge: 9.6 <\/strong><\/p>\n
\n
Rehabilitation Case Study<\/h2>\n
Ms. L admitted to Cedar View Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center on June 14, 2022 under the care of Dr. Janarthanan Someswarananthan. During the course of the stay, Occupational Therapy, and Physical Therapy were initiated to efficiently and effectively identify her unique needs and tailor specialized treatment plans to successfully transition to the next level of care. <\/p>\n
On admission, she was noted to require minimal assistance with lower body dressing, contact guard assistance with bathing, toileting, ambulation and transfers and setup assistance with upper body dressing. Decreased balance and activity tolerance also increased her risk for falling. She has been working with the interdisciplinary team and participating in care plan meetings and therapy throughout her stay. Her participation was limited in the beginning of her stay due to weakness and overall deconditioning, but as she improved and increased her strength, she was able to increase her participation in higher level functional activities. <\/p>\n
The therapy team provided skilled interventions to address her adaptation, compensation, and restoration potential and coordinated with the interdisciplinary team to ensure appropriate clinical care areas were addressed. On June 25, 2022, she successfully discharged home being able to complete upper body dressing independently and bathing, lower body dressing, toileting, ambulation and transfers with modified independence. Great work Ms. L! <\/p>\n
Overall Composite Score Outcomes <\/h3>\n
Rehabilitation outcomes are assessed on a 10-point rating scale. 10 is the most independent level of ability, and 1 is the most dependent level of ability. A score of 0 may represent an inability to perform the task. The Model 10 Composite Score represents his overall outcomes. <\/p>\n
Rehabilitation Length of Stay: 12 Days<\/strong> Ms. T admitted to Cedar View Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center on August 17, 2022 under the care of Dr. Janarthanan Someswarananthan. During the course of the stay, Occupational Therapy, and Physical Therapy were initiated to efficiently and effectively identify her unique needs and tailor specialized treatment plans to successfully transition to the next level of care.<\/p>\n On admission, she was noted to require minimal assistance with toileting, contact guard assistance with bathing and hygiene tasks and standby assistance with upper body dressing, bed mobility, ambulation and transfers. Decreased balance and activity tolerance also increased her risk for falling. She has been working with the interdisciplinary team and participating in care plan meetings and therapy throughout her stay. Her participation was limited in the beginning of her stay due to weakness and overall deconditioning, but as she improved and increased her strength, she was able to increase her participation in higher level functional activities. <\/p>\n The therapy team provided skilled interventions to address her adaptation, compensation, and restoration potential and coordinated with the interdisciplinary team to ensure appropriate clinical care areas were addressed. On August 25, 2022, she successfully discharged home being able to complete hygiene tasks independently and bathing, toileting, upper body dressing, bed mobility, ambulation and transfers with modified independence. Great work Ms. T!<\/p>\n Rehabilitation outcomes are assessed on a 10-point rating scale. 10 is the most independent level of ability, and 1 is the most dependent level of ability. A score of 0 may represent an inability to perform the task. The Model 10 Composite Score represents his overall outcomes.<\/p>\n Rehabilitation Length of Stay: 9 Days<\/strong> Admitting Diagnosis: <\/strong>Pneumonia A 55-year-old gentleman was admitted to Cedar View Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center from Holy Family Hospital on October 30, 2020 for skilled nursing and therapy services to safely return home. Upon admission, Mr. H. was evaluated by and participated in skilled occupational and physical therapy where he was noted to require contact guard assistance for most self-care tasks, to transfer and ambulate 50 feet, standby assistance to perform bed mobility and was noted to have decreased balance and activity tolerance increasing his risk for falls. As he progressed with his therapy goals, he was able to participate in higher level functional activities such as stair training and car transfers while maintaining his safety. Upon discharge, Mr. H. was able to perform all self-care tasks, bed mobility, transfer, ambulate 1000 feet with no adaptive device and ascend and descend 12 stairs independently while maintaining his low fall risk tasks. He made great gains toward his therapy and was able to return home with home care services. Great work Mr. H.!<\/p>\n 10.0 \u2013 Complete Independent \u2013 No assist, no equipment Admitting Diagnosis: <\/strong>Spinal Fusion, Lumbar Region A 67-year-old female was admitted to Cedar View Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center from Lawrence General Hospital for skilled nursing and therapy services to safely return home. Upon admission, Mrs. T. was evaluated by and participated in skilled occupational and physical therapy where she was note to require moderate\/maximum assistance for most selfcare tasks, bed mobility, transfers and gait and was noted to have decreased balance and activity tolerance increasing her risk for falls. As she progressed with her therapy goals, she was able to participate in higher level functional activities such as balance training, stair training and car transfers while maintaining her safety. Upon discharge, Mrs. T. was able to perform all selfcare tasks, bed mobility, was able to transfer and ambulate 100 feet with modified independence and was able to ascend and descend 4 stairs with supervision. She was a low fall risk and had decreased pain. She made great gains toward her therapy goals and was able to return home with strong family support and home health services. Great work Mrs. T.!<\/p>\n 10.0 \u2013 Complete Independent \u2013 No assist, no equipment Rehabilitation Case Study Mr. B admitted to Cedar View Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center on May 06, 2022 under the care of Dr. Janarthanan Someswarananthan. During the course of the stay, Occupational Therapy, and Physical Therapy were initiated to efficiently and effectively identify his unique needs and tailor specialized treatment plans to successfully transition to the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
\nFunctional Outcome Level Upon Admission: 5.3 <\/strong>
\nFunctional Outcome Level Upon Discharge: 9.2 <\/strong><\/p>\n
\nRehabilitation Case Study<\/h2>\n
Overall Composite Score Outcomes<\/h3>\n
\nFunctional Outcome Level Upon Admission: 5.4<\/strong>
\nFunctional Outcome Level Upon Discharge: 9.1<\/strong><\/p>\n
\nCase Study<\/h2>\n
\nSpecialty Program: <\/strong>Pulmonary
\nDischarge Location:<\/strong> Home<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/cedarviewrehab.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/17\/2021\/01\/Cedar-View-Clinical-Outcome-Ebalst-K.H._03.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\n9.0 \u2013 Modified Independent \u2013 No Assist, but equipment or extra time
\n8.0 \u2013 S\/u \u2013 No physical assist other than set-up; supervision for safety\/technique; and\/or single cue to initiate
\n7.0 \u2013 Supervision-No physical assist; supervision for safety\/technique; and\/or single cue to initiate
\n6.0 \u2013 SBA-Pt. performs task with close supervision and or visual\/verbal cues for task completion
\n5.0 – CGA \u2013 Contact Guard Assist
\n4.0 \u2013 Min \u2013 Occasional assist (25% or less time or effort to complete)
\n3.0 \u2013 Mod \u2013 Frequent assist (40-50% of the time or effort involved to complete task
\n2.0 \u2013 Max \u2013 Constant assist (75-90% of the time or effort involved to complete task
\n1.0 \u2013 CD \u2013 Complete Dependence: No contribution from pt; task done by others or not assessed<\/p>\n
\nCase Study<\/h2>\n
\nDischarge Location:<\/strong> Home<\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/cedarviewrehab.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/17\/2021\/01\/cedarview-Asset-1.png\")
<\/p>\n
\n9.0 \u2013 Modified Independent \u2013 No Assist, but equipment or extra time
\n8.0 \u2013 S\/u \u2013 No physical assist other than set-up; supervision for safety\/technique; and\/or single cue to initiate
\n7.0 \u2013 Supervision-No physical assist; supervision for safety\/technique; and\/or single cue to initiate
\n6.0 \u2013 SBA-Pt. performs task with close supervision and or visual\/verbal cues for task completion
\n5.0 – CGA \u2013 Contact Guard Assist
\n4.0 \u2013 Min \u2013 Occasional assist (25% or less time or effort to complete)
\n3.0 \u2013 Mod \u2013 Frequent assist (40-50% of the time or effort involved to complete task
\n2.0 \u2013 Max \u2013 Constant assist (75-90% of the time or effort involved to complete task
\n1.0 \u2013 CD \u2013 Complete Dependence: No contribution from pt; task done by others or not assessed<\/p>\n
\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"